The inverse problem is raised by the domain of Montu which is built away from any star projection.
In my meaning, the explanation lies in the period when the various temples were built. Aufrère, Golvin et Goyon, in "L' EGYPTE RESTITUEE, sites et temples de Haute Egypte", account for these facts in the following way :
In the same way,the authors I quoted before give us the following pieces of information :
This should therefore show that the Temple of Montu probably didn't exist when the works began in around 2000.
About the Theban gods, it should be remembered that the animal acting as an attribute to Montu was Boukhis the bull when that of Amun was the ram. As we already know, the vernal point passed from the Taurus constellation (the bull) to that of Aries (the ram) at the time when Montu-Bull was supplanted by Amun-Ram (end of the third millenary). This correlation - which has been known for quite a long time - shows that the Egyptians had probably noticed the retrogradation of the vernal point through two constellations linked, as in Chaldea, to a bull (Taurus) and a ram (Aries).
It seems most likely that the contellation projected on the Theban soil was associated with a ram. About this, let's remember that criosphinxes (ram-headed sphinxes) can be seen in the Temple of Amun and along the dromos (processional avenues).
This is an important point, for, the divisions and the symbols of the egyptian celestial sphere don't often have any connection with those used in Chaldea (and therefore with ours).
Return to main page